Thoughts on organizational vibe-coding: what works, what breaks at scale, and how we think about the problem at Vibe Coder.
2026-09-01
Who coined "vibe coding", when, and how a single tweet became Collins Dictionary's Word of the Year — and a security and maintainability reckoning the industry is still sorting out.
Read more →2026-08-26
We checked what a few tools charge for IP allowlisting and country blocking (spoiler: one charges $100/month per project for IP alone). On Vibe Coder both are included on every app - so you can rebuild an old internal tool and lock it to your org from day one.
Read more →2026-08-09
Vibe coding is more than autocomplete — it moves the unit of work from line to feature. A plain explanation of how it works, where it helps, and the failure modes that separate a demo from a production app.
Read more →2026-08-09
The difference in one sentence: in traditional you write code, in vibe coding you describe intent and steer generated code. Where the work moves, which skills matter, when each approach wins — and why they're not mutually exclusive.
Read more →2026-08-09
A completer suggests the next line; an agent plans, generates, runs, and iterates in a loop. The distinction is what decides whether a tool can build an app or only help write a line — and the context problem that decides whether it scales past v1.
Read more →2026-07-14
Demos are impressive. Real, months-old projects are a different story. Why a tool's context erodes as a project grows — and what that costs teams building with it every day.
Read more →2026-07-08
Many vibe-coding tools generate a pretty interface wired to external managed services. It feels fast — until your organization needs real server logic, control over its data, or simply to leave the platform.
Read more →2026-06-30
For organizations trying to adopt vibe-coding at scale, the AI bill at the end of the month is a too-familiar surprise. Without real-time cost visibility, expensive retry loops slip by unnoticed.
Read more →